John, who is a 21-year-old college student, wanted to discuss some spiritual concerns with Pastor Mark that resulted from some challenges he recently faced in college. John has attended Pastor Mark’s church since he was a young child, and he and his parents have enjoyed Pastor Mark’s messages over the years. Pastor Mark also happens to be a licensed counselor, wherein he meets his clients at the church. Pastor Mark agrees to meet with John, and they both decide to meet at the church as it is a place that is convenient and familiar. With John discussing his spiritual concerns, he appears to benefit from the time with Pastor Mark over the first three meetings; however, in the fourth meeting, John comes across as very nervous, and Pastor Mark asks about John’s nervousness. John asked Pastor Mark if he could share something in confidence, and Pastor Mark stated, “Of course.” John shared that he sexually molested his 12-year-old nephew about 3 months ago and felt deep shame about what happened and had never done anything like this before. In the state where John and Pastor Mark live, a licensed counselor is known as a “mandated reporter,” wherein sexual molestation of a child must be reported to the proper authorities. However, the state also has laws known as clergy-penitent privilege wherein pastors can keep things in confidence that church members share with them. In essence, Pastor Mark is not required to disclose information that John shared with him.
Based on the above scenario, answer each numbered item below with a ½-page to 1-page double-spaced response. Use this document to type your answers below each question and submit to Canvas when completed.
Based on the stated information, what are the ethical dilemma(s) in this specific scenario? In your response, include elements that lead you to see it as an ethical dilemma. Be clear and specific about this information to support your assertion about the ethical dilemma(s).
Referencing the NOHS Ethical Standards for Human Professionals, what three codes could apply to this scenario? Include code numbers and themes in your response, and share how they could apply to the scenario.
Imagine that you are Pastor Mark in the above scenario. What would be your initial reaction to this situation? How do you think you would proceed in such a situation?
Using appropriate APA citation format for a direct quote, share one direct quote from the ethics textbook for this course that could relate to the above scenario, and share why you think this direct quote relates. (Reference is not required, and this particular response does not have to be ½ page.)
Applied Ethical Case Scenario Grading Rubric (8)
Applied Ethical Case Scenario Grading Rubric (8)
Criteria Ratings Pts
Content and Learning Task Requirements Each step is addressed clearly in the ethical decision making model. Information for each step conveys understanding as applied to the case scenario s (The steps will be approximately 10 points each.)
80 to >70 pts
Proficient
The provided information noted in Column 1 is necessary and sufficient enough to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
70 to >66 pts
Competent
The provided information noted in Column 1 is necessary and sufficient enough for the most part to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
66 to >0 pts
Novice
The provided information noted in Column 1 is not necessary and sufficient enough to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
/ 80 pts
Quality of Writing Clarity of sentences and paragraphs No errors in spelling, grammar or use of English Organization and coherence of ideas
20 to >18 pts
Proficient
The case scenario information is well written from start to finish, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The case scenario is well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way.
18 to >16 pts
Competent
The case scenario information is well written, for the most part, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The case scenario information is, for the most part, well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way
16 to >0 pts
Novice
The case scenario information is not well written and contains many spelling errors, and/or grammar errors and/or use of English errors. The case scenario information is poorly organized, lacks clarity and/or does not present ideas in a coherent way.
/ 20 pts
Total Points: 0
p
John, who is a 21-year-old college student, wanted to discuss some spiritual concerns with Pastor Mark that resulted from some challenges he recently faced in college. John has attended Pastor Mark’s church since he was a young child, and he and his parents have enjoyed Pastor Mark’s messages over the years. Pastor Mark also happens to be a licensed counselor, wherein he meets his clients at the church. Pastor Mark agrees to meet with John, and they both decide to meet at the church as it is a place that is convenient and familiar. With John discussing his spiritual concerns, he appears to benefit from the time with Pastor Mark over the first three meetings; however, in the fourth meeting, John comes across as very nervous, and Pastor Mark asks about John’s nervousness. John asked Pastor Mark if he could share something in confidence, and Pastor Mark stated, “Of course.” John shared that he sexually molested his 12-year-old nephew about 3 months ago and felt deep shame about what happened and had never done anything like this before. In the state where John and Pastor Mark live, a licensed counselor is known as a “mandated reporter,” wherein sexual molestation of a child must be reported to the proper authorities. However, the state also has laws known as clergy-penitent privilege wherein pastors can keep things in confidence that church members share with them. In essence, Pastor Mark is not required to disclose information that John shared with him.
Based on the above scenario, answer each numbered item below with a ½-page to 1-page double-spaced response. Use this document to type your answers below each question and submit to Canvas when completed.
Based on the stated information, what are the ethical dilemma(s) in this specific scenario? In your response, include elements that lead you to see it as an ethical dilemma. Be clear and specific about this information to support your assertion about the ethical dilemma(s).
Referencing the NOHS Ethical Standards for Human Professionals, what three codes could apply to this scenario? Include code numbers and themes in your response, and share how they could apply to the scenario.
Imagine that you are Pastor Mark in the above scenario. What would be your initial reaction to this situation? How do you think you would proceed in such a situation?
Using appropriate APA citation format for a direct quote, share one direct quote from the ethics textbook for this course that could relate to the above scenario, and share why you think this direct quote relates. (Reference is not required, and this particular response does not have to be ½ page.)
Applied Ethical Case Scenario Grading Rubric (8)
Applied Ethical Case Scenario Grading Rubric (8)
Criteria Ratings Pts
Content and Learning Task Requirements Each step is addressed clearly in the ethical decision making model. Information for each step conveys understanding as applied to the case scenario s (The steps will be approximately 10 points each.)
80 to >70 pts
Proficient
The provided information noted in Column 1 is necessary and sufficient enough to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
70 to >66 pts
Competent
The provided information noted in Column 1 is necessary and sufficient enough for the most part to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
66 to >0 pts
Novice
The provided information noted in Column 1 is not necessary and sufficient enough to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
/ 80 pts
Quality of Writing Clarity of sentences and paragraphs No errors in spelling, grammar or use of English Organization and coherence of ideas
20 to >18 pts
Proficient
The case scenario information is well written from start to finish, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The case scenario is well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way.
18 to >16 pts
Competent
The case scenario information is well written, for the most part, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The case scenario information is, for the most part, well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way
16 to >0 pts
Novice
The case scenario information is not well written and contains many spelling errors, and/or grammar errors and/or use of English errors. The case scenario information is poorly organized, lacks clarity and/or does not present ideas in a coherent way.
/ 20 pts
Total Points: 0
p
John, who is a 21-year-old college student, wanted to discuss some spiritual concerns with Pastor Mark that resulted from some challenges he recently faced in college. John has attended Pastor Mark’s church since he was a young child, and he and his parents have enjoyed Pastor Mark’s messages over the years. Pastor Mark also happens to be a licensed counselor, wherein he meets his clients at the church. Pastor Mark agrees to meet with John, and they both decide to meet at the church as it is a place that is convenient and familiar. With John discussing his spiritual concerns, he appears to benefit from the time with Pastor Mark over the first three meetings; however, in the fourth meeting, John comes across as very nervous, and Pastor Mark asks about John’s nervousness. John asked Pastor Mark if he could share something in confidence, and Pastor Mark stated, “Of course.” John shared that he sexually molested his 12-year-old nephew about 3 months ago and felt deep shame about what happened and had never done anything like this before. In the state where John and Pastor Mark live, a licensed counselor is known as a “mandated reporter,” wherein sexual molestation of a child must be reported to the proper authorities. However, the state also has laws known as clergy-penitent privilege wherein pastors can keep things in confidence that church members share with them. In essence, Pastor Mark is not required to disclose information that John shared with him.
Based on the above scenario, answer each numbered item below with a ½-page to 1-page double-spaced response. Use this document to type your answers below each question and submit to Canvas when completed.
Based on the stated information, what are the ethical dilemma(s) in this specific scenario? In your response, include elements that lead you to see it as an ethical dilemma. Be clear and specific about this information to support your assertion about the ethical dilemma(s).
Referencing the NOHS Ethical Standards for Human Professionals, what three codes could apply to this scenario? Include code numbers and themes in your response, and share how they could apply to the scenario.
Imagine that you are Pastor Mark in the above scenario. What would be your initial reaction to this situation? How do you think you would proceed in such a situation?
Using appropriate APA citation format for a direct quote, share one direct quote from the ethics textbook for this course that could relate to the above scenario, and share why you think this direct quote relates. (Reference is not required, and this particular response does not have to be ½ page.)
Applied Ethical Case Scenario Grading Rubric (8)
Applied Ethical Case Scenario Grading Rubric (8)
Criteria Ratings Pts
Content and Learning Task Requirements Each step is addressed clearly in the ethical decision making model. Information for each step conveys understanding as applied to the case scenario s (The steps will be approximately 10 points each.)
80 to >70 pts
Proficient
The provided information noted in Column 1 is necessary and sufficient enough to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
70 to >66 pts
Competent
The provided information noted in Column 1 is necessary and sufficient enough for the most part to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
66 to >0 pts
Novice
The provided information noted in Column 1 is not necessary and sufficient enough to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
/ 80 pts
Quality of Writing Clarity of sentences and paragraphs No errors in spelling, grammar or use of English Organization and coherence of ideas
20 to >18 pts
Proficient
The case scenario information is well written from start to finish, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The case scenario is well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way.
18 to >16 pts
Competent
The case scenario information is well written, for the most part, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The case scenario information is, for the most part, well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way
16 to >0 pts
Novice
The case scenario information is not well written and contains many spelling errors, and/or grammar errors and/or use of English errors. The case scenario information is poorly organized, lacks clarity and/or does not present ideas in a coherent way.
/ 20 pts
Total Points: 0
p
John, who is a 21-year-old college student, wanted to discuss some spiritual concerns with Pastor Mark that resulted from some challenges he recently faced in college. John has attended Pastor Mark’s church since he was a young child, and he and his parents have enjoyed Pastor Mark’s messages over the years. Pastor Mark also happens to be a licensed counselor, wherein he meets his clients at the church. Pastor Mark agrees to meet with John, and they both decide to meet at the church as it is a place that is convenient and familiar. With John discussing his spiritual concerns, he appears to benefit from the time with Pastor Mark over the first three meetings; however, in the fourth meeting, John comes across as very nervous, and Pastor Mark asks about John’s nervousness. John asked Pastor Mark if he could share something in confidence, and Pastor Mark stated, “Of course.” John shared that he sexually molested his 12-year-old nephew about 3 months ago and felt deep shame about what happened and had never done anything like this before. In the state where John and Pastor Mark live, a licensed counselor is known as a “mandated reporter,” wherein sexual molestation of a child must be reported to the proper authorities. However, the state also has laws known as clergy-penitent privilege wherein pastors can keep things in confidence that church members share with them. In essence, Pastor Mark is not required to disclose information that John shared with him.
Based on the above scenario, answer each numbered item below with a ½-page to 1-page double-spaced response. Use this document to type your answers below each question and submit to Canvas when completed.
Based on the stated information, what are the ethical dilemma(s) in this specific scenario? In your response, include elements that lead you to see it as an ethical dilemma. Be clear and specific about this information to support your assertion about the ethical dilemma(s).
Referencing the NOHS Ethical Standards for Human Professionals, what three codes could apply to this scenario? Include code numbers and themes in your response, and share how they could apply to the scenario.
Imagine that you are Pastor Mark in the above scenario. What would be your initial reaction to this situation? How do you think you would proceed in such a situation?
Using appropriate APA citation format for a direct quote, share one direct quote from the ethics textbook for this course that could relate to the above scenario, and share why you think this direct quote relates. (Reference is not required, and this particular response does not have to be ½ page.)
Applied Ethical Case Scenario Grading Rubric (8)
Applied Ethical Case Scenario Grading Rubric (8)
Criteria Ratings Pts
Content and Learning Task Requirements Each step is addressed clearly in the ethical decision making model. Information for each step conveys understanding as applied to the case scenario s (The steps will be approximately 10 points each.)
80 to >70 pts
Proficient
The provided information noted in Column 1 is necessary and sufficient enough to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
70 to >66 pts
Competent
The provided information noted in Column 1 is necessary and sufficient enough for the most part to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
66 to >0 pts
Novice
The provided information noted in Column 1 is not necessary and sufficient enough to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
/ 80 pts
Quality of Writing Clarity of sentences and paragraphs No errors in spelling, grammar or use of English Organization and coherence of ideas
20 to >18 pts
Proficient
The case scenario information is well written from start to finish, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The case scenario is well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way.
18 to >16 pts
Competent
The case scenario information is well written, for the most part, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The case scenario information is, for the most part, well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way
16 to >0 pts
Novice
The case scenario information is not well written and contains many spelling errors, and/or grammar errors and/or use of English errors. The case scenario information is poorly organized, lacks clarity and/or does not present ideas in a coherent way.
/ 20 pts
Total Points: 0
John, who is a 21-year-old college student, wanted to discuss some spiritual concerns with Pastor Mark that resulted from some challenges he recently faced in college. John has attended Pastor Mark’s church since he was a young child, and he and his parents have enjoyed Pastor Mark’s messages over the years. Pastor Mark also happens to be a licensed counselor, wherein he meets his clients at the church. Pastor Mark agrees to meet with John, and they both decide to meet at the church as it is a place that is convenient and familiar. With John discussing his spiritual concerns, he appears to benefit from the time with Pastor Mark over the first three meetings; however, in the fourth meeting, John comes across as very nervous, and Pastor Mark asks about John’s nervousness. John asked Pastor Mark if he could share something in confidence, and Pastor Mark stated, “Of course.” John shared that he sexually molested his 12-year-old nephew about 3 months ago and felt deep shame about what happened and had never done anything like this before. In the state where John and Pastor Mark live, a licensed counselor is known as a “mandated reporter,” wherein sexual molestation of a child must be reported to the proper authorities. However, the state also has laws known as clergy-penitent privilege wherein pastors can keep things in confidence that church members share with them. In essence, Pastor Mark is not required to disclose information that John shared with him.
Based on the above scenario, answer each numbered item below with a ½-page to 1-page double-spaced response. Use this document to type your answers below each question and submit to Canvas when completed.
Based on the stated information, what are the ethical dilemma(s) in this specific scenario? In your response, include elements that lead you to see it as an ethical dilemma. Be clear and specific about this information to support your assertion about the ethical dilemma(s).
Referencing the NOHS Ethical Standards for Human Professionals, what three codes could apply to this scenario? Include code numbers and themes in your response, and share how they could apply to the scenario.
Imagine that you are Pastor Mark in the above scenario. What would be your initial reaction to this situation? How do you think you would proceed in such a situation?
Using appropriate APA citation format for a direct quote, share one direct quote from the ethics textbook for this course that could relate to the above scenario, and share why you think this direct quote relates. (Reference is not required, and this particular response does not have to be ½ page.)
Applied Ethical Case Scenario Grading Rubric (8)
Applied Ethical Case Scenario Grading Rubric (8)
Criteria Ratings Pts
Content and Learning Task Requirements Each step is addressed clearly in the ethical decision making model. Information for each step conveys understanding as applied to the case scenario s (The steps will be approximately 10 points each.)
80 to >70 pts
Proficient
The provided information noted in Column 1 is necessary and sufficient enough to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
70 to >66 pts
Competent
The provided information noted in Column 1 is necessary and sufficient enough for the most part to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
66 to >0 pts
Novice
The provided information noted in Column 1 is not necessary and sufficient enough to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
/ 80 pts
Quality of Writing Clarity of sentences and paragraphs No errors in spelling, grammar or use of English Organization and coherence of ideas
20 to >18 pts
Proficient
The case scenario information is well written from start to finish, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The case scenario is well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way.
18 to >16 pts
Competent
The case scenario information is well written, for the most part, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The case scenario information is, for the most part, well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way
16 to >0 pts
Novice
The case scenario information is not well written and contains many spelling errors, and/or grammar errors and/or use of English errors. The case scenario information is poorly organized, lacks clarity and/or does not present ideas in a coherent way.
/ 20 pts
Total Points: 0
I agree to the toolJohn, who is a 21-year-old college student, wanted to discuss some spiritual concerns with Pastor Mark that resulted from some challenges he recently faced in college. John has attended Pastor Mark’s church since he was a young child, and he and his parents have enjoyed Pastor Mark’s messages over the years. Pastor Mark also happens to be a licensed counselor, wherein he meets his clients at the church. Pastor Mark agrees to meet with John, and they both decide to meet at the church as it is a place that is convenient and familiar. With John discussing his spiritual concerns, he appears to benefit from the time with Pastor Mark over the first three meetings; however, in the fourth meeting, John comes across as very nervous, and Pastor Mark asks about John’s nervousness. John asked Pastor Mark if he could share something in confidence, and Pastor Mark stated, “Of course.” John shared that he sexually molested his 12-year-old nephew about 3 months ago and felt deep shame about what happened and had never done anything like this before. In the state where John and Pastor Mark live, a licensed counselor is known as a “mandated reporter,” wherein sexual molestation of a child must be reported to the proper authorities. However, the state also has laws known as clergy-penitent privilege wherein pastors can keep things in confidence that church members share with them. In essence, Pastor Mark is not required to disclose information that John shared with him.
Based on the above scenario, answer each numbered item below with a ½-page to 1-page double-spaced response. Use this document to type your answers below each question and submit to Canvas when completed.
Based on the stated information, what are the ethical dilemma(s) in this specific scenario? In your response, include elements that lead you to see it as an ethical dilemma. Be clear and specific about this information to support your assertion about the ethical dilemma(s).
Referencing the NOHS Ethical Standards for Human Professionals, what three codes could apply to this scenario? Include code numbers and themes in your response, and share how they could apply to the scenario.
Imagine that you are Pastor Mark in the above scenario. What would be your initial reaction to this situation? How do you think you would proceed in such a situation?
Using appropriate APA citation format for a direct quote, share one direct quote from the ethics textbook for this course that could relate to the above scenario, and share why you think this direct quote relates. (Reference is not required, and this particular response does not have to be ½ page.)
Applied Ethical Case Scenario Grading Rubric (8)
Applied Ethical Case Scenario Grading Rubric (8)
Criteria Ratings Pts
Content and Learning Task Requirements Each step is addressed clearly in the ethical decision making model. Information for each step conveys understanding as applied to the case scenario s (The steps will be approximately 10 points each.)
80 to >70 pts
Proficient
The provided information noted in Column 1 is necessary and sufficient enough to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
70 to >66 pts
Competent
The provided information noted in Column 1 is necessary and sufficient enough for the most part to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
66 to >0 pts
Novice
The provided information noted in Column 1 is not necessary and sufficient enough to provide an accurate reflection of the understanding of applying an ethical decision making model to a case scenario.
/ 80 pts
Quality of Writing Clarity of sentences and paragraphs No errors in spelling, grammar or use of English Organization and coherence of ideas
20 to >18 pts
Proficient
The case scenario information is well written from start to finish, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The case scenario is well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way.
18 to >16 pts
Competent
The case scenario information is well written, for the most part, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The case scenario information is, for the most part, well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way
16 to >0 pts
Novice
The case scenario information is not well written and contains many spelling errors, and/or grammar errors and/or use of English errors. The case scenario information is poorly organized, lacks clarity and/or does not present ideas in a coherent way.
/ 20 pts
Total Points: 0
‘s End-User License Agreement
This assignment submission is my own, original wo
I agree to the tool’s End-User License Agreement
This assignment submission is my own, original wo
I agree to the tool’s End-User License Agreement
This assignment submission is my own, original wo
Last Completed Projects
topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
---|